Member You
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > News and Society > Politics > Will Democrats Control Congressional Spending?

Tags

  • alcohol
  • homes
  • every
  • election campaign
  • federal dollars
  • funds wisely

  • Links

  • How To Lose Fat In the Butt the 'Dumb' Way
  • Doggin' Chicago: Where To Hike With Your Dog In The City Of The Big Shoulders
  • Relationship Advice: The Law of Nagging
  • Member You - Will Democrats Control Congressional Spending?

    Dummy Cameras: Fool the Robber & Protect Yourself
    Having real security cameras installed is a good way to observe people and spot a crime. However, in some cases, dummy (fake spy cameras) can also do quite a good job protecting the property.Of course, it doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t use real cameras. In such places like banks or gas stations for instance, real cameras are simply must. But for home or small business owners, fake cameras might be a really cheap and effective solution to protect their merchandise and money.What are Dummy Cameras?If you haven’t heard a lot
    d be minimal considering the overall level of federal spending, the limiting of "special" projects that waste taxpayer dollars would be an important psychological victory. It would send the message that both Democrats and Republicans understand that they have a responsibility to spend taxpayer funds wisely, for those funds are limited and must be used for worthwhile projects and programs.

    The 2007 federal budget sent to Congress by President Bush will cost taxpayers $2.77 trillion. It is imperative that we find savings by trimming unnecessary fat and reigning in reckless pet projects. In the absence of reform, the Heritage foundation says in its Issues 2006 Candidate's B

    What Is A Good Credit Score?
    If you have ever gone shopping for a new car or made an attempt to purchase a new home then you are probably familiar with your credit score. Even if you haven’t made any type of purchase that required you to obtain a loan or credit due to the amount of money involved you’ve probably still seen or heard the words credit score mentioned on the television or in a business or financial article. The reason for this is because our financial well being in today’s complicated credit/loan society revolves around that very powerful three digit number known as our cred
    When Democrats take control of the House and Senate in January, they will have the opportunity to push through Congress the many legislative promises that they campaigned on in the run-up to the midterm Congressional elections.

    Of course, those legislative promises have to be paid for, and the problem for Democrats is that they also promised there would be no new deficit spending. So how can Representative Pelosi and Senator Reid advance their social agenda for the lower and middle classes without engaging in the deficit spending that has become a trademark of Washington politicians? Two options: raise taxes or cut current federal spending programs.

    So far, only a few Democrats have openly called for repealing the President's tax cuts. Several in the new majority promised no increases in taxes during the election campaign and so far the issue doesn't seem to be high on the priority list when Democrats first start calling the shots in Congress in a couple of months. So that leaves spending cuts, and there is plenty of fat to be trimmed from the bloated federal budget.

    According to the Heritage Foundation, federal spending has reached $22,000 per household, in constant dollars, for the first time since World War II and discretionary spending has jumped forty-nine percent in just three years. Congressional spending is out of control and entitlement spending is a significant contributor.

    So if cuts are to be made, a good place to start is with the outrageous pet projects that our Senators and Representatives, Democrat and Republican alike, regularly slip into legislative bills to funnel limited federal dollars back to their home districts, states, friends, and business partners.

    Citizens Against Government Waste, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that tracks government spending, reports in their 2006 edition of The Congressional Pig Book an amazing 10,000 special projects in eleven different legislative bills. The cost to taxpayers so that our politicians can look great to their constituents is an unbelievable $29 billion! And that's just in the 2006 edition. And what are taxpayers getting for their money? Well, we gave $13.5 million for the International Fund for Ireland, which includes money for the World Toilet Summit. And we added $500,000 for the Arctic Winter Games and $5.6 million for studying the effects of alcohol and drug abuse to defense spending bills.

    Granted, the $29 billion outlined in the 2006 Pig Book are but a tiny drop in an ever-increasing federal budget, but it is a great place to start. While the savings to American taxpayers would be minimal considering the overall level of federal spending, the limiting of "special" projects that waste taxpayer dollars would be an important psychological victory. It would send the message that both Democrats and Republicans understand that they have a responsibility to spend taxpayer funds wisely, for those funds are limited and must be used for worthwhile projects and programs.

    The 2007 federal budget sent to Congress by President Bush will cost taxpayers $2.77 trillion. It is imperative that we find savings by trimming unnecessary fat and reigning in reckless pet projects. In the absence of reform, the Heritage foundation says in its Issues 2006 Candidate's Br

    Drug Trade Accounts for Forty Percent of the Afghan Economy
    The voice on the radio suddenly forced its way into my conscious awareness. Absolutely staggering, I felt it deep in my gut with no uncertainty.Forty Percent of the Afghan economy is from illegal drug production and trafficking. More disturbing is the fact that the United States has nothing that can replace the drug trade for Afghan entrepreneurs.As I contemplated these hard hitting statements, I found myself imagining how different our world could be if we just stuck to some basic tenants of common decency.Yet, what does this say about our
    few Democrats have openly called for repealing the President's tax cuts. Several in the new majority promised no increases in taxes during the election campaign and so far the issue doesn't seem to be high on the priority list when Democrats first start calling the shots in Congress in a couple of months. So that leaves spending cuts, and there is plenty of fat to be trimmed from the bloated federal budget.

    According to the Heritage Foundation, federal spending has reached $22,000 per household, in constant dollars, for the first time since World War II and discretionary spending has jumped forty-nine percent in just three years. Congressional spending is out of control and entitlement spending is a significant contributor.

    So if cuts are to be made, a good place to start is with the outrageous pet projects that our Senators and Representatives, Democrat and Republican alike, regularly slip into legislative bills to funnel limited federal dollars back to their home districts, states, friends, and business partners.

    Citizens Against Government Waste, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that tracks government spending, reports in their 2006 edition of The Congressional Pig Book an amazing 10,000 special projects in eleven different legislative bills. The cost to taxpayers so that our politicians can look great to their constituents is an unbelievable $29 billion! And that's just in the 2006 edition. And what are taxpayers getting for their money? Well, we gave $13.5 million for the International Fund for Ireland, which includes money for the World Toilet Summit. And we added $500,000 for the Arctic Winter Games and $5.6 million for studying the effects of alcohol and drug abuse to defense spending bills.

    Granted, the $29 billion outlined in the 2006 Pig Book are but a tiny drop in an ever-increasing federal budget, but it is a great place to start. While the savings to American taxpayers would be minimal considering the overall level of federal spending, the limiting of "special" projects that waste taxpayer dollars would be an important psychological victory. It would send the message that both Democrats and Republicans understand that they have a responsibility to spend taxpayer funds wisely, for those funds are limited and must be used for worthwhile projects and programs.

    The 2007 federal budget sent to Congress by President Bush will cost taxpayers $2.77 trillion. It is imperative that we find savings by trimming unnecessary fat and reigning in reckless pet projects. In the absence of reform, the Heritage foundation says in its Issues 2006 Candidate's B

    Things to Consider When Refinancing
    It is no secret that many people have been taking advantage of the recent record low interest rates to refinance their homes at more favorable rates. There are a number of excellent reasons for refinancing a home, but there are a number of important things to consider before taking the plunge.People refinance their homes for many reasons, but chief among them of course is the desire for a lower interest rate and a lower monthly payment. In some cases the homeowner may even be able to shorten the length of the mortgage loan through a refinancing deal.
    three years. Congressional spending is out of control and entitlement spending is a significant contributor.

    So if cuts are to be made, a good place to start is with the outrageous pet projects that our Senators and Representatives, Democrat and Republican alike, regularly slip into legislative bills to funnel limited federal dollars back to their home districts, states, friends, and business partners.

    Citizens Against Government Waste, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that tracks government spending, reports in their 2006 edition of The Congressional Pig Book an amazing 10,000 special projects in eleven different legislative bills. The cost to taxpayers so that our politicians can look great to their constituents is an unbelievable $29 billion! And that's just in the 2006 edition. And what are taxpayers getting for their money? Well, we gave $13.5 million for the International Fund for Ireland, which includes money for the World Toilet Summit. And we added $500,000 for the Arctic Winter Games and $5.6 million for studying the effects of alcohol and drug abuse to defense spending bills.

    Granted, the $29 billion outlined in the 2006 Pig Book are but a tiny drop in an ever-increasing federal budget, but it is a great place to start. While the savings to American taxpayers would be minimal considering the overall level of federal spending, the limiting of "special" projects that waste taxpayer dollars would be an important psychological victory. It would send the message that both Democrats and Republicans understand that they have a responsibility to spend taxpayer funds wisely, for those funds are limited and must be used for worthwhile projects and programs.

    The 2007 federal budget sent to Congress by President Bush will cost taxpayers $2.77 trillion. It is imperative that we find savings by trimming unnecessary fat and reigning in reckless pet projects. In the absence of reform, the Heritage foundation says in its Issues 2006 Candidate's B

    Your Credit Card - Know It Like It's Your Best Friend
    The use of credit cards in Australia is escalating possibly on the back of a good economy breeding confidence although do people know how to service this debt and how much it could be costing?Australians owe $32 billion in credit card debt, according to Reserve Bank figures, and some experts predict this will balloon to almost $50 billion by 2009.Thats a staggering figure and as it would it appear it's definately on the rise with Baycorp Advantage, a credit information provider, saying that credit card applications were up 11 per cent on last year
    erent legislative bills. The cost to taxpayers so that our politicians can look great to their constituents is an unbelievable $29 billion! And that's just in the 2006 edition. And what are taxpayers getting for their money? Well, we gave $13.5 million for the International Fund for Ireland, which includes money for the World Toilet Summit. And we added $500,000 for the Arctic Winter Games and $5.6 million for studying the effects of alcohol and drug abuse to defense spending bills.

    Granted, the $29 billion outlined in the 2006 Pig Book are but a tiny drop in an ever-increasing federal budget, but it is a great place to start. While the savings to American taxpayers would be minimal considering the overall level of federal spending, the limiting of "special" projects that waste taxpayer dollars would be an important psychological victory. It would send the message that both Democrats and Republicans understand that they have a responsibility to spend taxpayer funds wisely, for those funds are limited and must be used for worthwhile projects and programs.

    The 2007 federal budget sent to Congress by President Bush will cost taxpayers $2.77 trillion. It is imperative that we find savings by trimming unnecessary fat and reigning in reckless pet projects. In the absence of reform, the Heritage foundation says in its Issues 2006 Candidate's B

    My Advertising Budget Looks Like a Shoe String
    An aphorism used saying it takes money to make money. And it is obviously true in case of starting a business. A business cannot be started without a capital. And after starting it, you require money to expand it too. But now, with the coming of the internet, many ways have sprung up using which it is possible to expand your online business, or more specifically speaking, generating traffic to your site, without spending even a cent.In the internet, you will find many ways to jumpstart traffic flow to your site, most of which are paid services. There are
    d be minimal considering the overall level of federal spending, the limiting of "special" projects that waste taxpayer dollars would be an important psychological victory. It would send the message that both Democrats and Republicans understand that they have a responsibility to spend taxpayer funds wisely, for those funds are limited and must be used for worthwhile projects and programs.

    The 2007 federal budget sent to Congress by President Bush will cost taxpayers $2.77 trillion. It is imperative that we find savings by trimming unnecessary fat and reigning in reckless pet projects. In the absence of reform, the Heritage foundation says in its Issues 2006 Candidate's Briefing Book, the Congress will be faced with limited options.

    First, raise taxes every year until they are 57% higher than today, something no Democrat or Republican wants to be responsible for. Second, eliminate every federal program except Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid by 2045, which is never going to happen. And third, do nothing, which would threaten the entire economic well-being of the country.

    It is not hard to see that reform and fiscal restraint are our best options. Right now the Congress is doing nothing, and Americans continue to pay the price for their irresponsibility. Nancy Pelosi has proposed a "pay-as-you-go" policy that would force lawmakers to find a way to pay for new programs before they are adopted. It is a step in the right direction, provided that direction does not mean raising taxes. Remember, low tax rates are not the problem, careless federal spending is. Ms. Pelosi and the Democrats have an opportunity before them as they take control of the Congress. The question now is whether or not they will seize that opportunity for the sake of our country.

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.memberyou.net/article/192207/memberyou-Will-Democrats-Control-Congressional-Spending.html">Will Democrats Control Congressional Spending?</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.memberyou.net/article/192207/memberyou-Will-Democrats-Control-Congressional-Spending.html]Will Democrats Control Congressional Spending?[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Home Based Business Ideas - The Worst Idea You Could Possibly Imagine

    RSS Feeds in 2008 Candidates Websites Might Reach 75 Million Voters

    Do Reward Points Really Reward

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com