break this custom and religious tradition of the publishing industry. Let’s break this cycle and give an advantage to the authors, who work hard to bring information, literature and enlightenment to the rest of humanity.

Let’s not hold them back. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your qu

The debate of whether an author or writer of a book should be allowed to write a book review of their own work seems to have been settled. It is now against the social norm for them to opine. Yet why does this rule exist? Literary Critics say Authors should Not be allowed to Write Book Reviews of their work, but why? Could it be that the critics do not want competition?

Well I think they need competition, because many do not even read the entire book of those authors they critique. This is what happens when there is no competition and a monopoly. Oh, yes but then there is the Joe Schmo who writes an article about a book or a book review? Are they more qualified than the author himself in judging the work or understanding its meaning or intent?

Of course not but this is exactly why we now have literary critics as they are just barely above the average citizen’s book reviews? Not much competition there. Still we lock out the author himself from writing their own book review? Why? Because it is shameless self-promoting? So. Because there “might” be a conflict of interest? Because it is against the social norm? I do not disagree on those points, yet I think it is laughable that;

We are going to allow everyone in the world to write a book review about the book you wrote EXCEPT you? How discriminatory is that? This shows the ridiculous nature of this “public tradition” and thus it should be busted. And I believe online article submission sites ought to be able to break this custom and religious tradition of the publishing industry. Let’s break this cycle and give an advantage to the authors, who work hard to bring information, literature and enlightenment to the rest of humanity.

Let’s not hold them back. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your qu

>

Well I think they need competition, because many do not even read the entire book of those authors they critique. This is what happens when there is no competition and a monopoly. Oh, yes but then there is the Joe Schmo who writes an article about a book or a book review? Are they more qualified than the author himself in judging the work or understanding its meaning or intent?

Of course not but this is exactly why we now have literary critics as they are just barely above the average citizen’s book reviews? Not much competition there. Still we lock out the author himself from writing their own book review? Why? Because it is shameless self-promoting? So. Because there “might” be a conflict of interest? Because it is against the social norm? I do not disagree on those points, yet I think it is laughable that;

We are going to allow everyone in the world to write a book review about the book you wrote EXCEPT you? How discriminatory is that? This shows the ridiculous nature of this “public tradition” and thus it should be busted. And I believe online article submission sites ought to be able to break this custom and religious tradition of the publishing industry. Let’s break this cycle and give an advantage to the authors, who work hard to bring information, literature and enlightenment to the rest of humanity.

Let’s not hold them back. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your qu

r intent?

Of course not but this is exactly why we now have literary critics as they are just barely above the average citizen’s book reviews? Not much competition there. Still we lock out the author himself from writing their own book review? Why? Because it is shameless self-promoting? So. Because there “might” be a conflict of interest? Because it is against the social norm? I do not disagree on those points, yet I think it is laughable that;

We are going to allow everyone in the world to write a book review about the book you wrote EXCEPT you? How discriminatory is that? This shows the ridiculous nature of this “public tradition” and thus it should be busted. And I believe online article submission sites ought to be able to break this custom and religious tradition of the publishing industry. Let’s break this cycle and give an advantage to the authors, who work hard to bring information, literature and enlightenment to the rest of humanity.

Let’s not hold them back. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your qu

ocial norm? I do not disagree on those points, yet I think it is laughable that;

We are going to allow everyone in the world to write a book review about the book you wrote EXCEPT you? How discriminatory is that? This shows the ridiculous nature of this “public tradition” and thus it should be busted. And I believe online article submission sites ought to be able to break this custom and religious tradition of the publishing industry. Let’s break this cycle and give an advantage to the authors, who work hard to bring information, literature and enlightenment to the rest of humanity.

Let’s not hold them back. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your qu

break this custom and religious tradition of the publishing industry. Let’s break this cycle and give an advantage to the authors, who work hard to bring information, literature and enlightenment to the rest of humanity.

Let’s not hold them back. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your quest to be the best in 2007. I thank you for reading my many articles on diverse subjects, which interest you.